My ex and I had a drama-filled relationship and a rough break-up. Drama because I was drinking, which meant I was sometimes out of my mind, and rough because I got my shit together and tried to make it right with her but she dumped me anyway. The problem is that we work for the same boss, and now that we’re not together anymore, but I’m sober and sane, I’m wondering how to act towards her. Be friendly and normal? Are hugs in bounds? I can’t just ignore her, and I don’t want to, but things are strange. I want to show her that I’m cool, not nuts, and want things between us to be normal (whatever that means).

Be you an alcoholic or a Mormon, you have zero chance of instantly re-establishing friendship with someone you’ve just broken up with. Like cold fusion or a 2010 World Cup game without vuvuzelas, it’s never going to happen.

Since you are an ex-drinker, however, you should know that self-control is something you can never count on, particularly when your feelings for an ex-love are intense and her actions unpredictable.

Yes, you’d love to have a normal friendship; but ask yourself what your actual feelings are, and what they’ll push you to do, and what she’s likely to do in response, and, before you know it, you’ve got an answer that does not include the words “friendship” or “sobriety,” and may well include flying chairs.

Rather than holding yourself responsible for something you don’t control (always a no-no, unless you’re the President or a weatherman), your goal is to do what you can to promote mutual self-control and minimize pain. If that doesn’t meet your definition of “normal friendship,” I repeat, there is no such thing as normal friendship with someone you just ended a relationship with.

Maybe after some time passes and you both forget the hurt and bad behavior, you can get coffee together without excruciating awkwardness. For now, it’s more important that you salvage a working relationship and your job.

It doesn’t matter that you’d like to show her you don’t or do care, or that you’re happy without her, or dying because of her or that wish to re-unite/be friends/have some of that old crazy monkey sex, whatever. You’re entitled to have all those feelings and more, but keep them to yourself if you want to work and avoid a rapid re-enactment of your recent pain.

The standard operating procedure for limiting pain in these situations is labeled “polite detachment,” and blocks you from sharing or responding to feelings that fan the embers. She should get the same treatment as any other co-worker; polite hellos at the water cooler, appropriate eye contact, no flying furniture, and no hugs.

STATEMENT:
Stifle your romantic yearnings with the following directive. “My heart may want to share, but my job is to keep my job and protect my heart from receiving or delivering more hurt. So, if I seem stiff or cold, it’s not to wound, but to create a boundary that will help us both return to making a living.”

I had a tough childhood and spent lots of time in therapy learning how to take my feelings seriously and not let people step on me, so I think I did a pretty good job the other night, during a meeting of our coop board, when my neighbor, whom I like, was sarcastic about a project I proposed. I expect more respect, particularly from a friend and neighbor, so I really felt hurt and betrayed. But I was able to stand up and let him know I thought he’d been disrespectful. I was hoping he’d apologize, but afterward he walked out without looking at me. My goal is to get him to understand I want to be friends, but I won’t tolerate verbal abuse.

Sure, sometimes people are mean and shouldn’t be, and the hurt is real and devastating. It’s your responsibility, however, to figure out whether the mean people can ever recognize their meanness.

(If you’ve followed this blog, you know that most mean, hurtful people never recognize their own meanness, seeing it as retaliation for the wrongs of others, because that’s the way they are. If they recognized it they would have apologized and you wouldn’t be writing me).

When you try to hold a mean-blind meanie responsible for being nasty, he’ll tell you what you did to deserve it, and more. You’ll wind up more hurt, and he won’t.

Your background may have added to your being a very sensitive person. That’s not a horrible thing; your sensitivity probably makes you a better friend, more creative, and more tuned-in.

The downside is that being very/overly-sensitive may make you over-react, over-speak, and look bad, and then, if your right to feel offended depends on how you interpreted someone’s tone of voice (“tired” vs. “sarcastic and demeaning”), you’ll wind up arguing about the unprovable.

Your job then is to stop looking to change the meanie or bring about justice. Make the best of your relationship with him. If he’s worth the hurt, shut up, don’t fight, and keep the conversation cool, at least until you recover. If he’s not, shut up, bite the inside of your lip to keep from crying, and stay away.

In either case, keeping your feelings to yourself means less pain and more options. As a sensitive person, you always need to stop and think before you react. That’s not letting yourself get stepped on; it’s keeping your emotions from trampling all over your life.

STATEMENT:
Here’s a motivating statement: I have better missions in life than to stand up to jerks, regardless of how easily I’m hurt by them. If a worthwhile friend is a sometime jerk and can’t take a hint, I accept the pain, do my best to protect myself, and focus on what works. It’s too bad; but that’s life, and I don’t let hurt feelings determine how I deal with it.”

My boss has never really been supportive of my work, but we get along well, and it’s partly because I haven’t asked for a raise in over 20 years. Recently, however, he began to give me a hard time about leaving early, and it’s really pissed me off because I work a lot at home on the computer (my husband and I have trouble getting reliable after-school childcare) and I take pride in working hard. (It’s particularly unfair and infuriating because I’ve had an unusually good year and everyone, including my boss’s boss, the big boss, knows it and I was even thinking now, finally, I would get a raise. Certainly not a reprimand. I’m reaching my breaking point here, because it’s one thing to work your ass off for poor pay because you like the work and the people on your team, but another to be bullied over nothing on top of that. I’m meeting with the big boss tomorrow and my goal is to get the credit I deserve and maybe give him a piece of my mind.

Reassuring women about their feelings instead of giving them a raise is something guys have done to girls (and communication-sensitive people of all genders) since the glass ceiling was made out of quills.

This is not to say that men are entirely at fault; women make it easy for guys to do this by bringing up their feelings as a reason/using them to push for a raise, instead of letting facts and economics do the pushing for them.

So, if your goal is really to get the credit you deserve, you don’t mean a pat on the head and a gift certificate to the Teddy Bear mart. Unfortunately, if you give someone a piece of your mind instead of a business-like argument, that’s what you’ll get in return: a chance to express your feelings of pent-up outrage and hear that “he feels your pain” and values you greatly with no change to your paycheck.

What’s even worse about expressing outrage is that it may make the boy-bosses nervous and force them to band together against you. If you make them feel guilty for having underpaid for and underappreciated your work, they’re much more likely to justify themselves by finding fault with your performance than to blame themselves and see that justice is done.

Your real goal, 20 years in, is to try to get a raise, because a job is what you do to make money, not to be understood or have your feelings relieved, regardless of how much pressure they’re building up inside.

Shut up about your feelings, ask for a raise, and do it positively. Fortunately, you don’t need to be eloquent or impassioned. If you’ve got a good record of sales or productivity to back you up, which you do, you’ve got great ammunition, so just stay unemotional and cite the reasons the company would be smart to give it to you.

Mention your boss’s criticism in passing and then knock it down without implying he’s bad, mean, or intentionally unfair. Document as much as you can.

End pleasantly. Let the facts, and not your passionate or intimidating tone, persuade the big boss he should think hard about your raise, regardless of what your immediate boss is fussing about.

People can live their whole lives without getting what they deserve; but few people can work one place for 20 years without at least having a good case for increasing their paycheck. Be emotional, and you’ll get condescended to. Be professional, and you might actually get the cash.

STATEMENT:
“Thanks for finding time for this meeting. I want to propose a major raise because, for many years now, my responsibilities have expanded and my value to the company has increased, while my salary has gradually fallen farther behind what my peers make. This year, the great results my team and I achieved make the disparity more obvious. As much as I love working here, I don’t want to be penalized for my loyalty. My supervisor would probably agree with this reasoning, but recently he seemed distracted by the idea that I was leaving early. In fact, I’ve always worked hard but, particularly with the extra work this past year, working at home has been more efficient than staying in the office and looking busy. Here is a summary of my actual job description, some data about the range of salaries currently being paid for a comparable position, and my idea of what my salary should be. Please let me know what you think of my reasoning and, if you agree, what you can do to improve my salary.”

My work re-located six months ago, and since then, I’ve had to share a small office with another woman in my department. I’ve never known her that well or talked to her much before we became office-mates, but since the move, she’s made it really hard to get work done with her incessant over-sharing. It’s not just that she talks constantly, which she does, but that she talks about things I really don’t feel comfortable hearing about, like her sex life (or really her husband’s dependency on Cialis), speculation about our co-worker’s sex lives…she even started talking about her daughter’s sex life recently, which was the last straw. When I complained about her to a supervisor, however, he seemed to write off the situation as bad chemistry, or two ladies having a tiff, but I’m afraid that my inability to get work done is going to be reflected in poor performance, and then my job will really be on the line. My goal is to get this crazy woman out of my office.

Don’t get obsessed with pushing out your nattering office-mate, or your anger will weaken your case and allow you to be dismissed as, you guessed it, emotional.

You have a right to feel the way you do. Express your feelings, however, and the guys may dismiss you as an emotional girl having trouble with another hen.

Put your goal into business-like, unemotional terms on which all can agree. You want a work-place that allows you and others to get their work done and, if there’s a problem, you want to address it without negative feelings. Stick with this idea and it will keep you out of trouble.

Staying unemotional and logical also puts you and your boss on the right side of the law. Every dispute in an office can turn legal and, by Murphy’s Law, when it does, justice is seldom served (if anyone get’s served, it’s going to be you).

If you seem angry at your office-mate and she claims to be victimized by your making a big deal out of a few innocent statements, your boss has to worry about her protesting his reprimand.

Let your office-mate know, politely, each time you don’t wish to be distracted by a private conversation. Develop a formula that stays professional even if you have to use it many times. You could say, “I’d like to listen, but I’ve got to stay focused.” Even if you have to say it over and over again.

Collect facts because, like the previous mistreated worker, facts, not emotions, are where the strength in your complaint lies. Keep a log, so whenever she over-rides your polite request, write down the date, time, what she says and for how long.

When you present the problem to your boss, don’t make him think or do the work of data-gathering. State your commitment to finding respectful and positive solutions and your regret at having to document behavior you wish your colleague could control.

The more you edit out your anger, the more her own statements, particularly the inappropriately juicy parts, will speak for themselves without seeming exaggerated and the better your chances that the henhouse will be quiet again.

STATEMENT:
“Several months ago, I told my office-mate, respectfully, that I found it very distracting when she struck up a personal conversation when I was trying to concentrate and that, without meaning to be offensive, I would let her know when I needed her to stop. I followed up with an email making that point, which I’ve attached. Unfortunately, she really couldn’t stop herself and things didn’t get better, so here’s my record, covering the last month, of what she said after I asked her to stop. I know she doesn’t mean any harm, but this constitutes a kind of harassment and interference with my work—I need to meet productivity standards—and I need your help to get my work done.”

For a long time, I truly believed that my boss was my mentor, if not a father figure; he seemed to look out for me, take a special interest in my career, and generally groom me for promotion within his company. After I did well with responsibility, he’d come through with reasonable raises and he liked to tell people that he believes in promoting women. Recently, though, I’ve noticed that he does little more than flatter me now that he has me doing all the dirty jobs and he keeps all the interesting stuff for himself and two of his favorite “old boys.” He gets irritated whenever I suggest I could do more and likes to bask in the gratitude of his new favorite girl, a secretary with big tits and not much else. I’ve worked hard here over the years, and I don’t really want to find a new job, but I feel like I’ve been used and misled, and generally wasted my time under false pretenses. My goal is to get the recognition I deserve, even if it’s not from the mentor I thought I had.

Wanting recognition at work is a reasonable wish and, if it was just a problem of your learning how to speak up, dress up, and get rid of your braces, then more power to you.

Many people are familiar with the usual fairy stories, and have pushed themselves to be more assertive and reach their dreams. Not only hasn’t it worked, but it brought down crap on their heads to insure an unhappily ever after-style result.

Your sad fable teaches us three important lessons, the first being the most basic and important; life isn’t fair. In most schools or companies or families, you’ll be told that a major goal of leadership is to treat people fairly, and it is. You should also know, however, that many bosses and teachers and parents have big blind spots, particularly those who take great pride in being fair and encouraging you to speak your mind.

The second lesson is to beware of men who talk a big game about how much they support women, because, odds are, these men like to talk a big game about everything; if it’s not feminism, it’s their supreme fishing skills or their golf game. Talk, as you’ve learned, is cheap, which is exactly how he’s made you feel.

Then again, feelings don’t hold such a high premium, either, so don’t use them as an excuse to keep looking for answers.

Of course, you have a right to feel hurt, angry, and disappointed, but those feelings will cause you trouble if you express them. You thought you were knocking yourself out for someone who could unselfishly encourage your career. Now you know better.

Asking why is just another way of trying to control something you can’t, and asking twice means you don’t want to accept that fact. Life is unfair, mentor is actually a blowhard misogynist.

This brings us to the third and most valuable lesson, which is what to look for in a mentor, a major, worthwhile goal for the business school of real life. While it’s reasonable to make the most of a mentorship, remember that it has its limits, and work is just work. Don’t make it your goal to please a mentor. Instead, meet your own standards on the job, appreciate support when you get it, and remember that work is just work.

You’re trying to get ahead, but you’re also trying to build a boundary around work that protects your from taking it too personally. It’s a job, not a fairyland, and you’re not a princess that needs a mentor to save you. Be your own damn hero and slay those paychecks every week. The End.

STATEMENT:
Here’s a coaching statement to start your workday. “It’s time I relied on my own observations to readjust my expectations at work. It’s disappointing that I must disregard what others have promised me but it’s good that I have a clear vision of my own. I won’t let negative feelings interfere with the next step, which is to find the best way to make a living, given the opportunities available.”

A few years ago, a friend proposed to join me on a business venture. She had great networking skills and drive, but I had the ideas and business know-how, so she thought, and I agreed, that our chemistry would be a good fit. Well, after a couple of years into working together, things started to fall apart, because, as many ideas as I had and as good as she was at making contacts, our work styles were just too different, and we weren’t having enough success to continue. I thought she felt the same way—she seemed just as frustrated as I was—but instead, when I suggested that we down-grade our partnership, she was furious at me for what she felt was a personal betrayal. I tried to make it clear that it wasn’t personal, but she wasn’t hearing it, and it wasn’t long before she stopped talking to me entirely. What bothers me as much as the loss of our friendship is that I’m fairly certain she’s stolen a lot my ideas, taking sole credit and passing them off as her own, and I was too trusting to protect myself legally, and I fear she’s too vengeful to be reasonable. Is there any way to get her to be reasonable, or am I just screwed?

If a jilted ex-partner were just feeling mad and hurt, then trying to get them to act reasonably when they feel screwed is a do-able goal. You can expect that, after a while, they’ll remember the good times and what’s in their best interest, and civility will return. But that’s often hoping for too much since feelings, not reason, are steering the ship.

When someone feels terribly wronged, on the other hand, they’re willing to cut off their noses to spite their face because the world won’t be right again until you’re brought down. Letting them know you need anything from them does little more than tell them where you’re most vulnerable. They don’t want to negotiate, they want to destroy.

If you can pretend not to care that much about your ideas, and if you can persuade her that it’s in her interest to sign an agreement about them, then maybe she will. If you show her you would be very upset to see her steal your ideas, then you’re basically handing her a loaded gun.

If you look back, you probably had good reason to know that she’s oversensitive and vindictive. It’s understandable if you believe in ignoring the faults of friends, but that belief shouldn’t cross over to business partners.

In spite of the emotional firestorm, keep your feelings to yourself. Consult a lawyer and check out your options and how much they’ll cost. Then play your cards, if you have any.

If you don’t, you don’t, but when you’re dealing with someone who’s out for blood, it’s better to accept defeat up front than to enter into a war that will leave you absolutely destroyed in the long run.

STATEMENT:
Prepare a positive answer to the internal voice that wails “I’ve been screwed.” “I’ve gained much from this partnership and not the least is a greater appreciation of the risks of being screwed. I won’t let negative feelings get in the way of my doing more work and, if necessary, finding a better partnership.”

My husband always saw himself as the righteous protector of our daughter and, after our divorce, he got into the habit of dragging me into court to force me to pay for some super-costly treatment or schooling that was always no more than a little bit better than what was available for free, but he’d look like a hero to our daughter and the court and the social worker, and I’d look like a miserly shit, and I’d complain bitterly, which just got everyone more on his side, and I was screwed. My daughter bought the bullshit, which meant she and her father shared a tight bond based on hating me, the Scrooge. But I thought the court assaults would stop when she turned 18, until yesterday, when I learned he’s suing me, once again, this time to pay for our daughter’s college tuition, even though she never asked me, she’s over 18, and, with her history of alcohol abuse (and no attempt to get sober), paying for her to go to college without going to rehab first is a waste of money. I think they’re both just scraping the barrel for reasons to drag me into court and I’m getting flashbacks about being raped by the judge. I don’t have any illusion about all of us getting along, but I think it’s fair to want this craziness to stop.

Like it or not, it’s your ex’s legal right to haul you into court at his whim, force you to hire a lawyer, and make you look like a creep. As a reward, you get to give him a good chunk of your savings to pay for something you don’t believe in, to someone who’s out to ruin your life.

Say what you will about justice, but most of the time, it isn’t very fair.

There’s no way you can avoid feeling helpless and outraged, and there’s no shower long or hot enough to make the violated feeling walk away. If, however, your goal is to stop this from happening again by repeatedly venting your outrage, you’ll actually make it worse.

You’ve described the process well; when you’re angry, you look like a monster, not a victim. Your ex has got the knack for pushing your buttons down so well, you shouldn’t be surprised that he treats you like an ATM.

Instead of fighting back again and again then, accept the fact that he’s got you nailed, and shut up. (If you don’t like being told that, remember, I’m not the one who told you to marry him.)

Don’t mistake a Jerry Springer shouting match as the best way to stand up to someone. Remember, no matter how cleansing the venting is on Springer, nobody walked away from that show without looking like an asshole. If you can get yourself to shut up and keep your rage to yourself, you can start to work on a more effective defense. You’ve collected lots of good facts and they can speak for themselves…if you don’t drown them out with your feelings.

Put the facts together, forget your ex-husband’s allegations, and respond to the issues like a caring parent. Then sit back, shut up and be patient. Initially, people will believe him because he believes himself, but if the facts don’t check out, they’ll come around to your point of view.

Don’t pursue your daughter or the Tag Team of Educational Virtue will punish you with her silence. Make it clear that you care by taking your parental responsibilities seriously and articulating that it would be better for her to cultivate her own relationship with you. Beyond that, however, you can only respect her choice, and hope those facts, not blustery emotions, lead her to the light.

The legal process isn’t very fair, but as we often point out on this site, not much is, so it’s better to keep your mouth shut. If you don’t want to remain tied up in the courts forever, stay quiet until your ex has enough rope to hang himself.

STATEMENT:
Put your response in writing and edit out your rage. For example: “You and I both want our daughter to get a good education and I am more than willing to help financially if it looks like she is ready. I wish I knew how she’s been doing for the past 6 months, but I can’t say because she hasn’t kept in touch. Before that, as you know, she had several drug-related legal problems and hasn’t finished a course. As much as I share your desire to help, I don’t have any reason, as yet, to believe that she could make use of college. Asking the court to mandate me to pay her tuition does her a disservice and wastes a large portion of my remaining resources in legal fees. I would advise her to get sober first, get some work habits going, take a course or two, and then she’d have a better chance of success. Talking to me herself would also give her an opportunity to let me know what she’s accomplished and benefit from my input.”

I don’t think she beats him up, but my son can’t seem to stand up to his crazy wife, no matter what she does. She gets furious with him over nothing and then anything goes. She’s thrown away his model airplane collection, screamed at him in front of friends, and locked him out of the house. The grandkids are always nervous. She always has to have the last word and insists that he apologize for things he hasn’t done. I wish he could stand up for himself and let her know that she’s got to stop. She wouldn’t act like this if he were stronger. All he does is keep quiet, look sad, and try to make her happy, which allows her to act like a jerk. My goal is to protect him or teach him how to stand up for himself.

If standing up to someone means out-intimidating them, it’s seldom a good goal, particularly when you’re up against someone who seems to believe they’re as infallible as the Pope.

Go toe to toe with her holiness and you’ll get a slugfest that not only scares the kids, but draws police like flies. It’s tempting to believe that toughness will carry the day and straighten out the bad guys, but that’s only in the movies. Everyone wants it to happen, which is why you can sell tickets, because nobody ever sees it off the screen.

On the other hand, you don’t want your son to feel responsible for the anger and unhappiness of his crazy wife. It’s nice that he’s caring and nurturing, but this is the evil flip side of being overly-sensitive.

If you push him to confront her, he’ll feel more responsible for her feelings and you’ll quickly see his backside (as I’m sure you’ve already discovered); you’re actually making him more responsible for her feelings by suggesting that he could get her to act better if he was firmer.

He thinks he’s upset her, you think he hasn’t upset her enough, and you’re both making him responsible for her. The Pope/wife remains without fault. Holy shitstorm.

A better goal is to help your son develop a better boundary, and this doesn’t require confrontation or hostility. By a boundary, I mean not allowing an excessive feeling of responsibility for his wife’s unhappiness to get in the way of his doing what he thinks is right.

He wouldn’t fight back, he just wouldn’t take such a hard hit every time she attacks. Then eventually, please Jesus, he’d also ask for a divorce.

STATEMENT:
Show him how he can reject blame without attacking her. “I think we’ve got a good thing going and that it would be better if you could manage your anger. I want you to be happy but you’re right, after all is said and done, I don’t necessarily agree with you about what you feel I’ve done wrong. If you yell or try to punish me, it makes things worse. I am who I am. So my idea about how to make the best of things is to back away from confrontation. I’ll always listen to new suggestions but I won’t stay in the room with yelling or physical intimidation.”

I’m fine now (I’m 14), but I’m trying to figure out how to deal with a crazy father who physically abused me until a couple of years ago—that’s when my mother finally figured out what was happening and had me come live with her. The trouble is, I guess you could say my father doesn’t see reality the way other people do and he never remembers hitting me. In his mind, when he’d hit me, it was because I was trying to destroy him, so what he tells the judge is that he loves me and that my mother is a raging alcoholic who has brainwashed me to hate him (my mother stopped drinking after the divorce, years ago) and he really believes what he says. My goal is to get him to stay away from me and convince others that his version of reality isn’t real.

Kids aren’t the only ones who have trouble accepting the fact that we often can’t protect ourselves from scary crazy boogeymen, particularly when the craziness isn’t obvious, and the boogeymen are family.

We’ve said it here before: certain crazy people are not obviously crazy and are particularly good at persuading other people to see them as injured victims because they truly, truly believe they are, no matter what really happened. It’s a kind of sickness for which no one has the cure, and nobody feels sicker than the victims in the wake of these sickos, who don’t necessarily feel sick at all.

So cops, judges and social workers often can’t figure out who is telling the truth for a long time. Meanwhile, they often make mistakes and put restrictions on kids and families that hurt everyone and cost more money than the family can afford. It’s a sad fact of life, but they’re trying to do the right thing.

The system usually works to try and protect the weakest party, and when you’re aggressive, even if you’re just aggressively trying to get people to see the truth, you make sickos look that much more weak and innocent. It’s unfair, but pushing hard to express the truth will often push it underground.

So Dr. Lastname’s advice for kids is the same as for adults: don’t think that expressing your emotions sincerely and eloquently will solve the problem. If your father is sincere and has a good lawyer, he’ll persuade the judge that you have, possibly, been brainwashed by your mom, and they’ll treat you like a poor, emotional kid who deserves pity but doesn’t really know his own mind. Then everyone will spend lots of time visiting shrinks. Thanks for the business, but no thanks for the bullshit.

First things first, give up on the goal of convincing others, and try instead to make positive sense of this experience and prepare a statement that you could, if necessary, read to your father.

The less anger and fear you put in your statement, the more it will help others get at the truth. I’m not saying you shouldn’t have negative feelings—of course, they are what they are—but the goal of your statement is to keep out the negative feelings without in any way holding back on the facts of what really happened.

You might not make his sickness go away or get people to see the truth, but being clear, honest, and emotionless is the best protection against the boogeyman.

STATEMENT:
Here’s an example. “I think it’s a bad idea for us to spend time together. I know you care about me and want to see me, but I think you forget about the bad things that happen when you get upset and lose your temper. You forget about (put in details, including bruises and dates). I don’t want to hurt you and I want you to be happy but I don’t think we should spend time together until I’m old enough to protect myself from your temper. Sincerely.

I’d like to get help for my wife’s younger sister because she drives the family crazy. Simply put, she’s a lying drug-addict, and my wife’s parents are always trying to help her in a way that ruins things for the rest of us—they give her money, pressure my wife and me to accept her at family events, and then make us feel guilty if we don’t want to see her. She’s totally poisonous as she is, but I know she can’t help herself, and I’d like to get her real help, not just hand-outs and pretending everything’s OK, so we don’t have to continue like this.

Your goal is just as bad as your wife’s parents’ goal, because you’re both assuming that your sister-in-law can be helped when all the evidence points the other way. They’re throwing their money away at her directly, you’d be throwing your money away at “real help” she isn’t ready for. It’s a lose/lose.

Really, everyone wishes your sister-in-law could be helped, but proceeding on that assumption when it’s not true is a good way to make things worse, and that’s exactly what you’re complaining about.

The sad fact is, treatment is often hopeless. You know that’s true for lots of medical problems, from cancer to Crohn’s disease, so why not accept the fact that it’s equally true for everything else.

Instead, stick with the realistic hope that she’ll change someday, and that you (and others) will have an opportunity to help. It might happen, but it’s not something that you can make happen or are responsible for.

In the meantime, don’t blame her, because there’s a good chance she has as little control over the problem as you do, even though it’s her body and her problem. Blame life, it sucks more reliably than anyone or anything else.

Now that you’ve listened to me and given up on your goal of getting help for your sister-in-law, realistic thinking suggests some positive things for you to do. Since you’re not responsible for saving your sister-in-law or protecting your parents-in-law, you can bow out of family events you don’t really want to go to.

Ignore feelings of guilt or responsibility. You’d help if you could, but you can’t, and there are other important priorities, like going on with your life and enjoying time with those you love.

STATEMENT:
Prepare a statement that responds to the most guilt-provoking accusations you can imagine. “I’m concerned about my sister-in-law and take full responsibility for helping her whenever possible. One thing I’ve learned, though, from watching her parents do a wonderful job of trying to help her is that, for the time being, it’s just not possible. When it’s not possible, we do more good by distancing ourselves from her problems so as to limit their harm and provide her with more incentive to change. Distancing ourselves from her problems does not mean distancing ourselves from her. The better we protect ourselves, the more welcoming we will be if and when she begins recovery.”

My ex-wife cares about our kids, but she’s always been overbearing and intense, which is why I ‘m very happy not to be married to her now. Her latest rage, in both senses, came from her new therapist, who persuaded her that she’s depressed and has bad dreams because she was neglected and maybe abused by her alcoholic parents, so now she wants our kids to have no contact with them, their grandparents, at any time, whether the kids are staying with me or with her (we have joint custody). Now, I’m not crazy about her parents and they sometimes drink too much, but they never did anything unsafe and the kids love them, so I was shocked to hear from the kids that they miss their grandparents (my wife never informed me about her new policy). I don’t want to trigger a court fight with my wife—I can’t afford it, and neither can she, but she spares no expense when she feels her kids are threatened by the forces of evil—and I’ve got no great wish to put myself on the line for her parents, but I don’t like having her tell me what the kids can do when they’re with me and I don’t think losing their grandparents is good for them. My goal is to send her a message that she can’t control what our kids do when they’re with me and protect the kids from losing their grandparents.

The short answer is, you can’t win a pissing contest with a fire hydrant.

Yes, your ex-wife has no right to tell you what you can and can’t do with the kids when they’re with you, and yes, it hurts them to be cut off from their grandparents, and yes, in the short run it’s entirely within your power to facilitate grandparental visits.

No, none of this matters in the big picture.

If your wife is the kind of self-righteous, crusading, angry asshole you describe her as being, then you have very little power to make things better and many, many opportunities to make things worse.

In the trade, we call people like your ex “bad borderlines”, meaning they’re madder’n hell and get even madder when anyone, therapists especially, try to change them. “Asshole” is also a totally applicable term. Or, as you used to call her, “dear.”

The sad fact of life that you and your kids must live with is that your ex has her rages and there’s no stopping her. She’s itching for a target to drop her bomb on, regardless of how much damage she does to herself, her finances, or the feelings of all around her. Don’t oppose her unless it’s absolutely necessary and then, if at all possible, don’t be in the room when the bomb goes off.

If you think about it, your goal isn’t to protect your kids from her rage (not unless she leaves slap-marks or the equivalent, you can’t). If you try, predict what happens next; she gives the kids an emotional overdose (tears, sorrow, worry, anger) about the re-awakening of her trauma by their undoing her unselfish attempt to protect them, and after an hour or so, they’ll do anything for her to stop.

After all, they have to live with her for another eternity and, unless they’re pretty hardened cases, her disapproval hurts like hell. They then cop a plea against you, saying the crime was your idea, and she threatens to take you to court with the kids as her witness and a crazed, victim-rights lawyer as her champion. The asshole’s undefeated streak continues.

Instead of unleashing her ever-ready, hydrant-esque deluge of abuse, choose your battles. If the grandparents want to take her on, you can give them secret support, but save your energy for the big ones.

Yes, it might feel humiliating, but that’s the price of doing right by your kids when you chose an ex-wife like this one. So no, don’t take this one on…and don’t get tied down to a partner like this ever again.

STATEMENT:
Refresh your parenting mission statement. “I can’t protect my kids (or me, the dog, the grandparents or the postman) from my wife’s nastiness, but I can show my kids how to avoid unnecessary conflict, eat shit when required, and be proud of my ability to smile and say ‘that tasted goooood.’”

My boyfriend and I have a 2 year old son together and, for the first year, he was very loving and we lived together, though he was never great at keeping jobs or getting anywhere on time, but in the past year he started drugging more and staying away for days after I criticized him and never coming by when he promised to and then, when I’d tell him he couldn’t just drop by unannounced, he said he wouldn’t give me money if he couldn’t see his kid when he wants to and he’s been pretty bad about providing money anyway. Our son loves his father, but he now looks unhappy when his name comes up or when he drops by, and I don’t know how to protect him. The boy gets very upset when he hears us fighting, so I try to avoid conflict, but I can’t let my boyfriend come by and take his son whenever he wants. I don’t want him back because I don’t think he’ll ever settle down and be reliable, but I’d like him to see that his behavior is hurting his son and he needs to stop.

The first thing you need to do is separate your righteous emotions from what you want to accomplish. If your goal is to express yourself so beautifully, articulately, passionately and forcefully that you persuade your (I don’t think you’ll disagree that he’s an ex-) boyfriend to act like less of a jerk, you’re nuts.

He doesn’t get it, and he’ll tell you it’s all your fault for being mean and controlling and poisoning his son against him, and you don’t want to have that conversation again and again. Your friends will pat you on the back for standing up to him, and you’ll feel good…briefly, until you fight about the same shit again. It’s not worth it.

Decide for yourself whether you’re right about your son’s needs, regardless of how you feel about his father. Ask yourself if it’s in his interest to see his father at random times, given the disruption to his routine, yours, and the uncontrolled nature of his father’s mood, mouth, and sobriety, or to have his financial support dependent on his father’s feelings for you.

Even if it’s in his interest, ask yourself the most important question; if you can live your life that way. If you decide that your ex’s position is harmful and unworkable, and that your anger has nothing to do with your opinion, then you may be able to improve the situation, but only if you keep your feelings in check.

Accept the sad fact that you can’t change his mind, get him to understand, or communicate better. Then you’ll be much more effective at finding a legal way, if one exists, to get protection from his financial blackmail and bad visitation behavior.

Ask a lawyer what the law can do for you, how much it will cost, and what you need to do to document your ex’s bad behavior. Then you can decide whether the fight is worthwhile and how to strengthen your position while refusing to be drawn into a shit-slinging contest that will make you both smell as bad as you already feel.

STATEMENT:
Begin a business-like, positive, written correspondence. “My dear partner, I’m sorry we’re no longer together but I want you to have a positive relationship with our son and will do everything I can to make it happen. Given what I’ve seen of his negative reactions to your unscheduled visits and my own efforts to make ends meet when we run out of money, I think the following is necessary to make things work. You need to schedule regular time with him, come on time, provide regular child support (remember, it’s child support, not ex-partner support), and refrain from expressing unhappiness with me in his presence. If you can’t or won’t do those things, my legal advisor tells me the court will force these conditions on you because they’re what’s best for our son. I’d rather we agreed to these conditions ourselves. Sincerely.

I have a dedicated husband, three teenagers, a nice house, a well-behaved dog—it’s not a bad life—but I’ve had a nagging sadness my entire life, and I still do, despite all the good things I’ve got. I deal with it, admittedly, by drinking a bit. I wouldn’t say I’m a drunk, and my drinking doesn’t interfere with my parenting or my marriage anymore than my mood does, but I know that what I’m doing is self-medicating. My husband wants me to see a shrink because he thinks I should take real medication for depression, but if my drinking doesn’t mess up my life, and if, despite all I have, I can’t be happy, anyway, then I don’t understand what makes one medication better than the other. My goal isn’t to be happy, just to withstand my misery, my way, right or wrong.

I understand that chronic depression, which is what we call “nagging sadness” in the biz, isn’t fun. It can make you grumpy, negative, unmotivated, scattered, and lousy at whatever you’re trying to accomplish.

All that’s excluding the pain, so no wonder it can demoralize you into seeing a negative future for yourself. It’s enough to make you want to turn “what the fuck” into words to live by.

If there was some way to relieve your pain that was risk-free and didn’t affect your other life priorities, that would be wonderful (for you—the aforementioned biz would probably dry up).

Sadly, said riskless, perfect painkiller, psychic or otherwise, hasn’t been invented yet, which is why depression relief requires hard choices and can’t be your only goal.

Clearly, you’ve got other goals than depression relief, or you wouldn’t have the good family you do. Good families take lots of work, so I suspect you’re good at putting the goals of work and family-raising first. Being strong about these goals can’t make your depression go away, but it can keep depression from affecting what’s important, and that’s an accomplishment to be proud of.

Drinking hasn’t done you any apparent harm, but your decision-making method is dangerous. You didn’t weigh risks and benefits, and you didn’t mention the fact that drinking, in the long run, tends to make depression and anxiety worse, and doesn’t protect your brain from the risk of long term damage that depression is now known to cause.

Don’t tell yourself there’s no point in giving up your only source of happiness for the sake of a future that will never be happy. You don’t make most of your decisions that way, and it’s a bad example for your kids.

Do what’s right in the long run, even when there’s no light at the end of the tunnel, or at least consider doing what’s right, even when the long run doesn’t feel worth it, but you know it is.

You might feel like you’re damned if you do, damned if you don’t, but that’s your damned feelings talking, not your values.

STATEMENT:
Here’s a statement to guide your drinking decisions. “Alcohol gives me relief from depression and hasn’t done me any harm. But I know the risks from using alcohol increase over time and my future matters, (even if I don’t feel like it does), so I will keep looking for and considering lower-risk alternatives and try to make whatever decision is best for me and my family.”

I’m conscientious and hard-working and I don’t need a lot of praise from the boss—I’ve been in my line of work for a long time—but the thing that’s gotten me in trouble in the past, and what’s threatening my position at my current office, is that I hate it when someone acts like they’re doing more work than I do and the boss agrees. I need this job and I’m good at it, but I don’t want to lie down and roll over when someone says I’m a slacker and deprives me of respect I deserve. My goal is to keep my job and that means not letting anyone ruin my good reputation.

In a fair world, we’d all get respected for the hard work we do. The need to get respected is basic: most large companies do elaborate reviews, wasting tons of time, to make sure it happens; it gets most married couples fighting, sooner or later; it got Rodney Dangerfield to stretch his collar for decades.

So of course you know that the right to get the respect you deserve…doesn’t actually exist. That’s a fact of life, and it really hurts, but the best thing you can do is do what you think is right and hope that someone notices. That, and maybe hire someone good at PR (and acquire a taste for shit, since, sooner or later, at some point in your career, you’re going to be eating it, buffet-style).

I know, your friends tell you to stand up for yourself, and your company assures you that their HR department is there to help anyone who has been treated unfairly.

As your e-doctor, however, I’m telling you, bullshit. If you’re complaining to me, chances are that you’ve tried to speak up and it hasn’t worked. Worse, it’s drawing fire.

Yup, that’s what often happens, and it’s not because bosses and HR staff are insincere and evil, or at least not usually. People aren’t evil, they’re stupid; they speak different languages, then look at the same thing and come to opposite conclusions neither side can understand.

If you’re really good at describing someone else’s evil abuse of power and your abuser can’t see the abuse, but understands how you see him, you know what will happen—it’s the law of conservation of victimhood—it will come right back at you.

He’ll work harder to compile new instances of your slacking and you’ll have new fodder for outrage, less job security, and more reason to see a lawyer, thus making worker-boss divorce almost inevitable.

You want justice, you’ll get unemployment. The real injustice is that conscientious people often hurt the most over this issue, while a real slacker wouldn’t care.

Your goal should never be justice, but making the best of a shitty situation and keeping your job, if you have to, for as long as necessary. That means eating shit, smiling, and not letting moral outrage and helplessness stop you from searching for better work (or gathering evidence of mistreatment in case you can use it some day).

See a lawyer, by all means, to see what it takes to make a good case. Your goal, though, is to maintain your steady diet of shit and smile until the legal case is in place, if it ever is. In the meantime, stay strong, quiet, and well-stocked with tic-tacs.

STATEMENT:
Here’s a statement for quittin’ time. “I do a good day’s work for no respect and it hurts. I can’t change it and I can’t find another job. But the reason I work isn’t to get respect, but to make a living, and if I do that under difficult circumstances, I deserve more respect from the person who knows what’s going on, and that’s me.”